| Posted January
12, 2007: Harvest records show last season’s cost-slashing,
soil-building, no-till organic corn yields topped comparable tilled
organic and tilled non-organic fields here at The Rodale Institute.
Using an improved design of its no-till roller—and only
a legume cover-crop for fertility and weed management—the
Institute’s no-till organic corn plots produced 160 bushels
per acre (bu/a), compared to 143 bu/a for tilled organic plots.
This means the one-pass, roll/plant no-till system—with no
additional field passes until harvest—out-yielded normally
tilled and cultivated organic plots that experienced eight or nine
field passes (plowing, disking, cultipacking, planting, two rotary
hoe passes and two to three cultivator passes). Yield on comparable
chisel-tilled non-organic (conventional) plots was 113 bu/a.

For full details of the system’s development here—and
how it’s spurring innovation with collaborators across the
country— check out our No-till
Plus section.
For the past 15 years, TRI farm manager Jeff Moyer has been working
with Dave Wilson (resident agronomist) researchers and operations
staff to actively problem-solve and develop no-till and reduced-tillage
applications that work in our organic production systems. We continue
to improve these systems year by year. The 2006 results verified
the benefits of improvements made in the no-till system in seed
placement and weed management, giving us no-till yield superior
to our normal organic system for the first time.
The organic no-till figures show the competitive nature of established
organic grain crops—after the required organic transition
period and using well-selected crop rotations—compared with
non-organic production systems.
One of the myths about organic agriculture is the common claim
that organic yields cannot equal those of conventional agriculture.
For the past 26 years we have been growing corn and soybeans in
replicated, randomized large plots under organic and conventional
farming systems. Over the long haul, among well-managed organic
and conventional systems in our trial, we have seen that crop yields
between these systems are not statistically different.
This key result was reviewed by panels of scientific peers and
published in the highly regarded international scientific journal
Bioscience (Pimentel et al. 2005).
This year’s excellent results with the “holy grail”
of organic cropping—organic no-till—show further potential
to improve yield using the innovative low-input crop system where
applicable.
Support needed to improve sustainable systems
The long-term documentation from our farm’s unique living
laboratory provides results giving us the scientific platform for
testing the limits of organic production strategies.
It’s true that, in the short-term, organic transition can
represent a real management challenge to create healthy, living
soil using a suitable cropping system. The transition also requires
new marketing efforts to capitalize on new crops and crop attributes.
Despite these challenges, our studies show that, over the long
run, well-executed and entrepreneurial organic agriculture can be
completely competitive with conventional methods for yield and represents
real opportunities for conventional, sustainable and organic farmers
alike.
Conventional agro-industrial food production has received virtually
all food and agricultural research support over many decades. With
a jump up to an allocated $3 million per year for the current Farm
Bill, organic research still receives less 1 percent of the pie.
We believe that with additional research funding and attention,
organic agriculture will surpass the productivity of high-input
agriculture.
Research, demonstration and field production at The Rodale Institute
are yielding important activities to improve our agriculture and
food systems. Imagine the potential of a more broadly supported
initiative.  |